Showing posts with label Olympics London 2012. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Olympics London 2012. Show all posts
Sunday, July 22, 2012
Tuesday, July 17, 2012
Wenlock and Mandeville Olympic Undercover IRA Moles Targeted by British Army
Wenlock and Mandeville Targeted to be Whacked or Interned Without Trial in British Occupied Ireland Concentration Camp.
The BBC was nothing but a front for Lord Muck and the IRA an evil spying network of murderers. New documents have revealed. that Wenlock and Mandeville, two ex-employees of the now defunct BBC 606 and the official mascots for the 2012 Summer Olympics being held in London 2012, have unmasked the two Irish moles as agents working for the IRA, who have burrowed their way deep undercover of the radioactive Olympic Stadium, ready to explode at the closing ceremony.
New devastating evidence proves what Tory leaders have been saying for years, that the BBC is nothing but lies and propaganda, that even watching it is tantamount to treachery, and the only way to find out the truth is to watch government briefings on Gerry Adam's TV in British Occupied Ireland. Documents covering the period from September1971 to 9 May this year, indicate a contact between someone who may have been in IRA intelligence officer and someone whose name is very similar to a man that started work as a cleaner at the Olympic Stadium.
New devastating evidence proves what Tory leaders have been saying for years, that the BBC is nothing but lies and propaganda, that even watching it is tantamount to treachery, and the only way to find out the truth is to watch government briefings on Gerry Adam's TV in British Occupied Ireland. Documents covering the period from September1971 to 9 May this year, indicate a contact between someone who may have been in IRA intelligence officer and someone whose name is very similar to a man that started work as a cleaner at the Olympic Stadium.
"This damning level of infiltration into the Olympics is simply unbelievable," said one MI5 intelligence officer. "It is simply inconceivable. My brain is beginning to hurt as we speak. But I'm not in the least surprised. We now know that Wenlock and Mandeville spent all the money they earned at the BBC and from selling weapons of mass destruction to terrorists, on producing propaganda and speading lies for ex-colleagues working at the BBC."
The cleaner who used to also work for the BBC, would have had access to the inner workings of the BBC in the evenings, when everyone had gone home, it was revealed. It is not difficult to see how, using coded messages secreted inside BBC 606 broomhandles and bin-liners, he could have edited footage, to make it look like the Irish in British Occupied Ireland, weren't happy about UK troops liberating them. Pictures of dead innocent Irish were thought to have been mocked up during tea breaks in staff
canteen by Wenlock and Mandeville who are also believed to have hacked into the BBC's computer system, with the full knowledge of the management and rewritten the next day's news announcements to include lies and propaganda and dirty nasty filth about the UK government. Despite listening to their own rewritten reports, BBC editors didn't twig because their brains were so addled from hookah pipes, prostitutes and Irish propaganda fed into their brains from the age of two, one expert revealed.
A search of Wenlock and Mandeville's lockers at the Olympic Stadium by UK special forces at the weekend, also revealed several containers of dangerous chemicals and five dirty bombs, proof that they were also manufacturing biological and nuclear weapons from all the contaminated radioactive soil spread around the Olympic Stadium. Incredibly, the documents also prove that Osama bin Laden was also in control of the BBC for years and so Wenlock and Mandeville must have been best friends with Osama up to the time of his death, said a professor of logical deduction at Oxford.
The cleaner who used to also work for the BBC, would have had access to the inner workings of the BBC in the evenings, when everyone had gone home, it was revealed. It is not difficult to see how, using coded messages secreted inside BBC 606 broomhandles and bin-liners, he could have edited footage, to make it look like the Irish in British Occupied Ireland, weren't happy about UK troops liberating them. Pictures of dead innocent Irish were thought to have been mocked up during tea breaks in staff
canteen by Wenlock and Mandeville who are also believed to have hacked into the BBC's computer system, with the full knowledge of the management and rewritten the next day's news announcements to include lies and propaganda and dirty nasty filth about the UK government. Despite listening to their own rewritten reports, BBC editors didn't twig because their brains were so addled from hookah pipes, prostitutes and Irish propaganda fed into their brains from the age of two, one expert revealed.
A search of Wenlock and Mandeville's lockers at the Olympic Stadium by UK special forces at the weekend, also revealed several containers of dangerous chemicals and five dirty bombs, proof that they were also manufacturing biological and nuclear weapons from all the contaminated radioactive soil spread around the Olympic Stadium. Incredibly, the documents also prove that Osama bin Laden was also in control of the BBC for years and so Wenlock and Mandeville must have been best friends with Osama up to the time of his death, said a professor of logical deduction at Oxford.
The news that agents from intelligence services have attempted to infiltrate news organisations like the BBC has shocked media pundits worldwide. "I can't believe it," said the former head of MI5. "We have one over-riding rule here in London never interfere with the democratic rights of the media and freedom of speech. It just shows how low Wenlock and Mandeville are willing to go. I am outraged. If there's one thing we won't stand it is MI5 or MI6 agents working as British journalists. The media must be allowed to present information in whatever way it likes without any interference from us. Now I must go, I've got an Olympic report to edit, hearts, minds, the empire and all that, old chap."
Ms.Givings, speaking from the new Palace on the Thames, confirmed she has been hard at work creating a treble agent to infiltrate the Wenlock and Mandeville terrorist network at the Olympics. "After a hard day on the wards with director Stanley Kubrick who withdrew his 1971 epic Clockwork Orange, despite its status as an Irish art-house classic of the genre, I spent quite some time introducing Wenlock and Mandeville to sapphic love. I have loved women in the past and slept with them too. I think if you love and want to pleasure a woman, particularly if you are a woman yourself, then certainly you know how to do things in a certain way."
Ms Givings was indeed no slouch in the girl-on-girl department according to one furry cup guru "It tends to be the case that normal lesbians or bisexual moles may not perhaps be as well endowed as Ms. Givings in the phwoaaar department make indifferent lovers. Ms. Givings, on the other hand, can lead a whimpering partner to a shattering climax within seconds, before continuing to work the trembling recipient for days, if not weeks.However as I expressed my doubts to MsGivings, she became increasingly agitated. I had, she insisted, completely missed the point. The debate became increasingly acrimonious until, incredibly, a furious MsGivings pulled down her shorts and proceeded to urinate onto two expensive copies of Wenlock and Mandeville, while one of her M15 spokesperson colleagues Rebekah "Basher" Wade, lay underneath licking her lips.
Personally I think they should both have been sent home pending psychiatric evaluation. And while I am prepared to admit a certain sympathy with some peoples' love of the outdoor life, the Olympics and all that, I insisted that water sports are deadly. However they both said their tipping point was the exclusion of that golden boy of English soccer David Beckham from playing at the Olympics. MsGivings said "I don't think I'll ever work for MI5 again," she was visibly-shaken as she sat tearfully clutching a picture of Posh and Becks atop two jewel-encrusted thrones on their wedding day in 1999. "I'm on tablets from the doctor. It's me nerves,"
she explained, before breaking down entirely and blubbering uncontrollably into a English replica shirt.
Beckham apparently was not included in the Olympic team because he engaged in a golden shower with Rebecca Loos and one of her friends, had sold graphic text conversations between the pair to a UK tabloid. "He can't speak at the moment," said spokesperson Rebekah Wade. "He's already smashed up the flat and right now Nancy's holding him by his feet while he tries to get out to play some football" M15 spokesperson Rebekah "Basher" Wade defended the deployment of Jordan's WMCs (Weapons of Mass Circulation to unmask Wenlock and Mandeville ): "The girl's a national institution. Those Irish have targeted England's premier piece as well as our Olympic showpiece.
I am neither Gaeilgeoir nor Catholic - but I am still Irish
RITE & REASON: JAMES JOYCE in Portrait of the Artist says: “When the soul of man is born in this country there are nets flung at it to hold it back from flight. You talk to me of nationality, language, religion. I shall try to fly by those nets.”PATRICK SEMPLE
During my life I have had a sense of wanting to “fly by those nets”, to avoid the constraints of nationality, language and religion.
My family came to Ireland in the early 19th century from Scotland. My paternal grandfather was in the army in Ireland and in India. Having come home from the famous Nile expedition, he was posted to Wexford, where he died in 1909. I was born there 30 years later.
My parents, who were adult in 1922, as citizens gave the new State their full, but not uncritical, loyalty. Since I was a boy I have wanted to free myself from the narrow, self-conscious and extravagant national pride all around me.
I was born just 17 years after Independence, so as I grew up, I heard at every turn the espousal of Ireland and everything Irish, but always felt that self praise is no praise. Some teachers indoctrinated children with a nationalism that amounted to hatred of Britain – and we wonder why violent republicanism still rears its ugly head.
I once heard a language enthusiast on radio say that unless you spoke Irish, you were not a proper Irishman. According to this principle, I am numbered among the 95 per cent or more defective Irish people. However I am in favour of preserving the spoken language as far as possible.
Two native-speaker friends independently told me that sometimes so bad is the Irish on radio and television that they have to turn it off. Having been brought up a member of the Church of Ireland in the post-Independence period of triumphalist Catholicism, I was made to feel an outsider. For so many people, in Ireland and outside, Irish is synonymous with Roman Catholic. Brendan Corish, leader of the Labour Party in the 1960s, went even further and said publicly: “I am a Catholic first and an Irishman second.”
I resented being seen by fellow countrymen as being Irish but not the full shilling. I resented that being Irish, foreigners expected me to sit lightly to the law and to have an ongoing affair with alcohol. How then am I Irish?
I am Irish pure and simple. I am as Irish as the most extreme republican, as the greatest enthusiast for and most fluent speaker of the Irish language and as the most fervent Catholic.
I am neither proud nor ashamed of it. I am glad I am Irish and I know I could never live contentedly outside Ireland.
There are characteristics of Irish people that I appreciate: generosity to the afflicted, welcome to the stranger, relaxed approach to living and a particular sense of humour. However, none of these is exclusive to our people.
We are not God’s gift to the world. We are one of a multitude of peoples on the planet who live together within particular national boundaries. There are characteristics of many Irish people I do not appreciate: for example, the selfishness of being so laid back as to be unreliable and believing that the destructive use of alcohol is funny.
I’m not a Kerry republican, a Dublin 4 nationalist or an Ulster or any other kind of unionist. I’m not a Gaeilgeoir or a Catholic.
On the other hand I am not Anglo Irish in any sense – I don’t possess or ever did possess, a horse! Neither have I an emotional home in England. I don’t want to be other than Irish. I am simply a human being who was born on the island of Ireland – and I’m glad that I was.
Patrick Semple is a former Church of Ireland clergyman and writer. He teaches creative writing at NUIM His website is patricksemple.ie
Labels:
2012,
blogger,
Google Images,
London,
london 2012,
London Olympics,
Olympic Games,
Olympics,
Olympics London,
Olympics London 2012,
YouTube
Location:
London, UK
MILITARIZED OLYMPICS :British Occupied Ireland Comes to London 2012
According to Ms.Claire Evans paranormal expert the flaming torch symbolizes the Olympics and Satanists have always known it represents Lucifer. She elaborates in an excerpt below :
" London 2012 Olympic Games a Human Sacrifice?
HISTORY OF THE OLYMPIC GAMES
Signs are everywhere that something significant is going to happen at the Olympics. Having familiarizing with occult symbols I have found them so numerous, it’s astonishing. Perhaps I am just more aware of it but I feel these symbols far outnumber those in previous Olympics and they do not convey a great message.
People have always assumed that the torch relaying ceremony is derived from an ancient pagan tradition in the Olympics. It did not exist until the ceremonial lighting of the flame at the Olympic stadium in 1936, Berlin, under the orders of Adolf Hitler. He wanted it to symbolize the celebration of the Third Reich, Germany governed by the Nazi Regime.
It is true that a flame burnt 24 hours a day at Olympia in antiquity but the Games were never opened by the torch relay. Messengers heralded the opening by running through the streets instead of people running with the torch for 12 days.
The Olympic rings are not ancient either. They made their debut in 1920 at Antwerp, Belgiuim and were designed by Pierre de Coubertin, founder of the IOC and the father of the modern Olympic movement, in 1913. It was supposed to represent the first 5 Olympics but was disbanded when the Archduke Ferdinand of Austria was assassinated triggering the First World War.
Hitler’s influence incorporated the OIympic Rings into Olympic pageantry in Berlin and it has stuck ever since. Of course it is not savoury to equate these rings with Naziism. Leni Riefenstahl, the Olympia filmmaker and who also chronicled the rise of Hitler, forged the rings by etching them in a stone altar in the ancient city of Delphi, Greece, to mislead the world into believing the rings were an ancient pagan symbol and not associated with Hitler.
The Nazi Olympic rings

See all 7 photos
Source: Nazi Olympic rings

I would strongly advise anyone planning to go to the Olympics to cancel. "
Monday, July 16, 2012
MORE LONDON 2012 DOCTORED NUMBERS
The International Monetary Fund has downgraded its forecast for UK growth this year by more than any other developed nation and warned that the world economy is weakening.
The Washington-based organisation predicted on Monday that growth in the UK will all but evaporate in 2012 with a rise in GDP of just 0.2%, compared with a previous forecast of 0.8%.
Next year the much vaunted recovery will falter as the eurozone continues to argue over a longer term solution to its debt problems.
The IMF said in its latest World Economic Outlook that GDP across the UK – which is currently in recession – will increase by 1.4% in 2013 – a 0.6 percentage point cut from its previous 2% forecast. Only Spain has a bigger downgrade next year after the IMF said it will lose 0.7 percentage points and maintain its run of recessions for a third 12-month period.
Christine Lagarde, the former French finance minister who heads the IMF, has warned European leaders they must press ahead with further measures to deal with the euro crisis or growth forecasts could prove optimistic.
The IMF said in its latest report that without action to stimulate growth in emerging economies in Asia and South America, global growth could also suffer, while in the US the Obama administration needs to revitalise an economy that is hitting the buffers.
In a statement it said: "Clearly, downside risks continue to loom large, importantly reflecting risks of delayed or insufficient policy action.
"In Europe, the measures announced at the European Union (EU) leaders' summit in June are steps in the right direction. The very recent renewed deterioration of sovereign debt markets underscores that timely implementation of these measures, together with further progress on banking and fiscal union, must be a priority.
"In the United States, avoiding the fiscal cliff, promptly raising the debt ceiling, and developing a medium-term fiscal plan are of the essence. In emerging market economies, policymakers should be ready to cope with trade declines and the high volatility of capital flows."
Ed Balls MP, Labour's shadow chancellor, in response to the IMF's revised forecasts for the UK economy, said the forecasts were evidence the government's economic plan has failed.
"Last autumn the IMF forecast growth of just 1.6% this year and warned that if those expectations were undershot, the government should take urgent action to boost the economy including temporary tax cuts and more investment in infrastructure.
"Less than a year on, the IMF is now forecasting growth of just 0.2% this year and Britain is one of just two G20 countries in a double-dip recession. And the recession means borrowing is now going up. "
The Bank of England and the the Treasury's fiscal advisory body, the Office for Budget Responsibility, still forecast that the UK is likely to grow at 2% next year. Both organisations will be under pressure to follow the IMF's downgrade to 1.4%.
The significance of the downgrade is that low growth, while ending the recession, will prolong the longest depression in the last 100 years and will be insufficient to cut unemployment significantly.
Britian is still more than 4% below the level of GDP recorded in 2007 and about 12% below the trajectory set before the financial crisis. A Treasury spokesman said the IMF supported the government's view that the eurozone crisis was to blame for most of the UK's woes.
"Because the euro area is the UK's largest trading partner we are now feeling the effect across our economy. But as the chancellor said last week, we are not powerless to act in the face of the European debt storm: that's why the Treasury and the Bank of England are taking co-ordinated action to inject new confidence and support the flow of credit to where it is needed in the real economy."
Overall, the IMF moderated its projections for global growth to 3.5% in 2012 and 3.9% in 2013. Many other forecasters have argued the slowdown in the US and China will have a larger than expected drag on world trade and growth.
France fares little better than the UK this year with growth of 0.3%, but like most euro area countries is projected to suffer a shock next year with growth of just 0.8%. German GDP growth also declines from this year to next.
Italy and Spain will remain in recession next year, according to the IMF, placing a question mark over their ability to refinance their banks and generate sufficient goodwill from international lenders to prevent them from going bust. Fears that Spain and Italy will need a bailout from Brussels continue to weigh on global growth following the reluctance of Germany, Finland, Holland and Austria to sanction a fund capable of handling both countries.
Was the Petrol Price Rigged Too?
By Rowena Mason, Emma Rowley
July 16, 2012 "The Telegraph" -- Motorists may have been paying too much for their petrol because banks and other traders are likely to have tried to manipulate oil prices in the same way they rigged interest rates, an official report has warned.
Concerns are growing about the reliability of oil prices, after a report for the G20 found the market is wide open to “manipulation or distortion”.
Traders from banks, oil companies or hedge funds have an “incentive” to distort the market and are likely to try to report false prices, it said.
Politicians and fuel campaigners last night urged the Government to expand its inquiry into the Libor scandal to see whether oil prices have also been falsely pushed up.
They warned any efforts to rig the oil price would affect how much drivers pay at the pump, which soared to a record high of 137p per litre of unleaded earlier this year.
Robert Halfon, who led a group of 100 MPs calling for lower fuel prices, said the matter “needs to be looked at by the Bank of England urgently”.
“We need to know whether the oil price has been manipulated in a similar way to Libor,” the MP for Harlow said. “This impacts on millions of people all round the country concerned about the price of petrol at the pumps.”
Petrol retailers use oil price “benchmarks” to decide how much to pay for future supplies.
The rate is calculated by data companies based on submissions from firms which trade oil on a daily basis – such as banks, hedge funds and energy companies.
However, like Libor – the interest rate measure that Barclays was earlier this month found to have rigged – the market is unregulated and relies on the honesty of the firms to submit accurate data about all their trades.
This is one of the major concerns raised in the G20 report, published last month by the International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO).
In the study for global finance ministers, including George Osborne, the regulator warns that traders have opportunities to influence oil prices for their own profit.
It points out that the whole market is “voluntary”, meaning banks and energy companies can choose which trades to make public.
IOSCO says this “creates opportunity for a trader to submit a partial picture in order to influence the [price] to the trader’s advantage”.
In an earlier report, the regulator concluded: “It is open to companies to report only those deals that are in their own best interests for the rest of the market to see.”
The price reporting agencies, Platts and Argus, argue they employ journalists to weed out false data submitted by oil traders.
IOSCO says reporters are “well-aware that traders have an incentive to push the market one way or another and do not generally believe everything they are told”.
However it points out this system is heavily reliant on the “experience and training” of journalists to make a judgement about what the oil price should be.
Further alarm bells are being sounded by US regulators, who have already pointed out the rate-rigging scandal could spread to the oil market.
Scott O’Malia, a top official at the US Commodities Futures Commission, has drawn attention to the “striking similarity” between the potential for manipulating oil and Libor.
British regulators carrying out the Wheatley Review into the Libor scandal have this week signalled they will look into whether other markets were skewed.
Paul Tucker, the Bank of England’s deputy governor, told MPs that Barclays’ abuse of the Libor system may be only one part of the banks’ dishonesty over crucial financial information.
Politicians last night called on the Bank of England and the Government to take heed of IOSCO’S finding about the oil market to prevent another crisis of confidence in the banks.
Lord Oakeshott, the former Liberal Democrat Treasury spokesman, said the oil price system ought to be examined in the wake of the Libor scandal.
“Clearly it’s right we must shine a light on how other crucial benchmark prices are reported, especially when they affect the cost of living for millions of motorists,” he said.
Brian Madderson, chairman of the Petrol Retailers’ Association, also called for an investigation into the “alarming” conclusions of the G20 report.
“All the petrol retailers buy their products based on Platts prices,” he said. “If IOSCO thinks the price is open to manipulation it could well be and that would affect prices on the forecourts.”
Banks are also calling for reform of the oil price system, amid fears that it is open to abuse by a minority of traders.
Simon Lewis, chief executive of the Global Financial Markets Association, has raised concerns about the “opaque” way the oil price is worked out.
In a letter to IOSCO, he said price reporting agencies may not be as impartial as they claim, because they take fees from banks and oil companies to provide information.
“Incentives may arise to favour those who pay greater subscriber fees or provide greater access to market information,” he said.
Some experts, such as Raymond Learsy, a former commodities trader and author of Oil and Finance, have been warning for years that the oil market is open to corruption.
“Given how important Libor is, if that can be manipulated, then why can’t oil be manipulated?” he said. “The price lends itself to manipulation. The oil price is not a true reflection of supply and demand.”
The reporting agencies have hit back at claims their prices are open to distortion. In a joint statement, Platts and Argus said there are “fundamental differences” in the way Libor and oil prices are reported.
“Independent price reporting organisations are independent of and have no vested interest in the oil and energy markets,” they said. “Their ownership is transparent, and strict internal governance separates editorial and commercial functions. Independent price reporting organisations are not market participants, nor providers of transaction execution, clearing or settlement services.”
Platts added that there are four main differences between oil prices and Libor – the quality of its data, its independence, competition between reporting agencies and the transparency of its methodology.
By Rowena Mason, Emma Rowley
July 16, 2012 "The Telegraph" -- Motorists may have been paying too much for their petrol because banks and other traders are likely to have tried to manipulate oil prices in the same way they rigged interest rates, an official report has warned.
Concerns are growing about the reliability of oil prices, after a report for the G20 found the market is wide open to “manipulation or distortion”.
Traders from banks, oil companies or hedge funds have an “incentive” to distort the market and are likely to try to report false prices, it said.
Politicians and fuel campaigners last night urged the Government to expand its inquiry into the Libor scandal to see whether oil prices have also been falsely pushed up.
They warned any efforts to rig the oil price would affect how much drivers pay at the pump, which soared to a record high of 137p per litre of unleaded earlier this year.
Robert Halfon, who led a group of 100 MPs calling for lower fuel prices, said the matter “needs to be looked at by the Bank of England urgently”.
“We need to know whether the oil price has been manipulated in a similar way to Libor,” the MP for Harlow said. “This impacts on millions of people all round the country concerned about the price of petrol at the pumps.”
Petrol retailers use oil price “benchmarks” to decide how much to pay for future supplies.
The rate is calculated by data companies based on submissions from firms which trade oil on a daily basis – such as banks, hedge funds and energy companies.
However, like Libor – the interest rate measure that Barclays was earlier this month found to have rigged – the market is unregulated and relies on the honesty of the firms to submit accurate data about all their trades.
This is one of the major concerns raised in the G20 report, published last month by the International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO).
In the study for global finance ministers, including George Osborne, the regulator warns that traders have opportunities to influence oil prices for their own profit.
It points out that the whole market is “voluntary”, meaning banks and energy companies can choose which trades to make public.
IOSCO says this “creates opportunity for a trader to submit a partial picture in order to influence the [price] to the trader’s advantage”.
In an earlier report, the regulator concluded: “It is open to companies to report only those deals that are in their own best interests for the rest of the market to see.”
The price reporting agencies, Platts and Argus, argue they employ journalists to weed out false data submitted by oil traders.
IOSCO says reporters are “well-aware that traders have an incentive to push the market one way or another and do not generally believe everything they are told”.
However it points out this system is heavily reliant on the “experience and training” of journalists to make a judgement about what the oil price should be.
Further alarm bells are being sounded by US regulators, who have already pointed out the rate-rigging scandal could spread to the oil market.
Scott O’Malia, a top official at the US Commodities Futures Commission, has drawn attention to the “striking similarity” between the potential for manipulating oil and Libor.
British regulators carrying out the Wheatley Review into the Libor scandal have this week signalled they will look into whether other markets were skewed.
Paul Tucker, the Bank of England’s deputy governor, told MPs that Barclays’ abuse of the Libor system may be only one part of the banks’ dishonesty over crucial financial information.
Politicians last night called on the Bank of England and the Government to take heed of IOSCO’S finding about the oil market to prevent another crisis of confidence in the banks.
Lord Oakeshott, the former Liberal Democrat Treasury spokesman, said the oil price system ought to be examined in the wake of the Libor scandal.
“Clearly it’s right we must shine a light on how other crucial benchmark prices are reported, especially when they affect the cost of living for millions of motorists,” he said.
Brian Madderson, chairman of the Petrol Retailers’ Association, also called for an investigation into the “alarming” conclusions of the G20 report.
“All the petrol retailers buy their products based on Platts prices,” he said. “If IOSCO thinks the price is open to manipulation it could well be and that would affect prices on the forecourts.”
Banks are also calling for reform of the oil price system, amid fears that it is open to abuse by a minority of traders.
Simon Lewis, chief executive of the Global Financial Markets Association, has raised concerns about the “opaque” way the oil price is worked out.
In a letter to IOSCO, he said price reporting agencies may not be as impartial as they claim, because they take fees from banks and oil companies to provide information.
“Incentives may arise to favour those who pay greater subscriber fees or provide greater access to market information,” he said.
Some experts, such as Raymond Learsy, a former commodities trader and author of Oil and Finance, have been warning for years that the oil market is open to corruption.
“Given how important Libor is, if that can be manipulated, then why can’t oil be manipulated?” he said. “The price lends itself to manipulation. The oil price is not a true reflection of supply and demand.”
The reporting agencies have hit back at claims their prices are open to distortion. In a joint statement, Platts and Argus said there are “fundamental differences” in the way Libor and oil prices are reported.
“Independent price reporting organisations are independent of and have no vested interest in the oil and energy markets,” they said. “Their ownership is transparent, and strict internal governance separates editorial and commercial functions. Independent price reporting organisations are not market participants, nor providers of transaction execution, clearing or settlement services.”
Platts added that there are four main differences between oil prices and Libor – the quality of its data, its independence, competition between reporting agencies and the transparency of its methodology.
Labels:
2012,
blogger,
Google Images,
London,
london 2012,
London Olympics,
Olympic Games,
Olympics,
Olympics London,
Olympics London 2012,
YouTube
Location:
London College Of Fashion, London, UK
Sunday, July 15, 2012
AN OLYMPIAN LEGACY UK TO US
The Olympic Games reached their zenith in the 6th and 5th centuries BC, but then gradually declined in importance as the Romansgained power and influence in Greece. There is no consensus on when the Games officially ended, the most common-held date is 393 AD, when the emperor Theodosius I declared that all pagan cults and practices be eliminated. Another date cited is 426 AD, when his successor Theodosius II ordered the destruction of all Greek temples. After the demise of the Olympics, they were not held again until the late 19th century - Wiki
This Global Financial Fraud and its Gatekeepers
The media's 'bad apple' thesis no longer works. We're seeing systemic corruption in banking – and systemic collusion
By Naomi Wolf
The media's 'bad apple' thesis no longer works. We're seeing systemic corruption in banking – and systemic collusion
By Naomi Wolf
July 15, 2012 "The Guardian" --Last fall, I argued that the violent reaction to Occupy and other protests around the world had to do with the 1%ers' fear of the rank and file exposing massive fraud if they ever managed get their hands on the books. At that time, I had no evidence of this motivation beyond the fact that financial system reform and increased transparency were at the top of many protesters' list of demands.
But this week presents a sick-making trove of new data that abundantly fills in this hypothesis and confirms this picture. The notion that the entire global financial system is riddled with systemic fraud – and that key players in the gatekeeper roles, both in finance and in government, including regulatory bodies, know it and choose to quietly sustain this reality – is one that would have only recently seemed like the frenzied hypothesis of tinhat-wearers, but this week's headlines make such a conclusion, sadly, inevitable.
The New York Times business section on 12 July shows multiple exposes of systemic fraud throughout banks: banks colluding with other banks in manipulation of interest rates, regulators aware of systemic fraud, and key government officials (at least one banker who became the most key government official) aware of it and colluding as well. Fraud in banks has been understood conventionally and, I would say, messaged as a glitch. As in London Mayor Boris Johnson's full-throated defense of Barclay's leadership last week, bank fraud is portrayed as a case, when it surfaces, of a few "bad apples" gone astray.
The New York Times business section on 12 July shows multiple exposes of systemic fraud throughout banks: banks colluding with other banks in manipulation of interest rates, regulators aware of systemic fraud, and key government officials (at least one banker who became the most key government official) aware of it and colluding as well. Fraud in banks has been understood conventionally and, I would say, messaged as a glitch. As in London Mayor Boris Johnson's full-throated defense of Barclay's leadership last week, bank fraud is portrayed as a case, when it surfaces, of a few "bad apples" gone astray.
In the New York Times business section, we read that the HSBC banking group is being fined up to $1bn, for not preventing money-laundering (a highly profitable activity not to prevent) between 2004 and 2010 – a six years' long "oops". In another article that day, Republican Senator Charles Grassley says of the financial group Peregrine capital: "This is a company that is on top of things." The article goes onto explain that at Peregrine Financial, "regulators discovered about $215m in customer money was missing." Its founder now faces criminal charges. Later, the article mentions that this revelation comes a few months after MF Global "lost" more than $1bn in clients' money.
What is weird is how these reports so consistently describe the activity that led to all this vanishing cash as simple bumbling: "regulators missed the red flag for years." They note that a Peregrine client alerted the firm's primary regulator in 2004 and another raised issues with the regulator five years later – yet "signs of trouble seemingly missed for years", muses the Times headline.
A page later, "Wells Fargo will Settle Mortgage Bias Charges" as that bank agrees to pay $175m in fines resulting from its having – again, very lucratively – charged African-American and Hispanic mortgagees costlier rates on their subprime mortgages than their counterparts who were white and had the same credit scores. Remember, this was a time when "Wall Street firms developed a huge demand for subprime loans that they purchased and bundled into securities for investors, creating financial incentives for lenders to make such loans." So, Wells Fargo was profiting from overcharging minority clients and profiting from products based on the higher-than-average bad loan rate expected. The piece discreetly ends mentioning that a Bank of America lawsuit of $335m and a Sun Trust mortgage settlement of $21m for having engaged is similar kinds of discrimination.
Are all these examples of oversight failure and banking fraud just big ol' mistakes? Are the regulators simply distracted?
The top headline of the day's news sums up why it is not that simple: "Geithner Tried to Curb Bank's Rate Rigging in 2008". The story reports that when Timothy Geithner, at the time he ran the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, learned of "problems" with how interest rates were fixed in London, the financial center at the heart of the Libor Barclays scandal. He let "top British authorities" know of the issues and wrote an email to his counterparts suggesting reforms. Were his actions ethical, or prudent? A possible interpretation of Geithner's action is that he was "covering his ass", without serious expectation of effecting reform of what he knew to be systemic abuse.
And what, in fact, happened? Barclays kept reporting false rates, seeking to boost its profit. Last month, the bank agreed to pay $450m to US and UK authorities for manipulating the Libor and other key benchmarks, upon which great swaths of the economy depended. This manipulation is alleged in numerous lawsuits to have defrauded thousands of bank clients. So Geithner's "warnings came too late, and his efforts did not stop the illegal activity".
And then what happened? Did Geithner, presumably frustrated that his warnings had gone unheeded, call a press conference? No. He stayed silent, as a practice that now looks as if several major banks also perpetrated, continued.
And then what happened? Tim Geithner became Treasury Secretary. At which point, he still did nothing.
It is very hard, looking at the elaborate edifices of fraud that are emerging across the financial system, to ignore the possibility that this kind of silence – "the willingness to not rock the boat" – is simply rewarded by promotion to ever higher positions, ever greater authority. If you learn that rate-rigging and regulatory failures are systemic, but stay quiet, well, perhaps you have shown that you are genuinely reliable and deserve membership of the club.
Whatever motivated Geithner's silence, or that of the "government official" in the emails to Barclays, this much is obvious: the mainstream media need to drop their narratives of "Gosh, another oversight". The financial sector's corruption must be recognized as systemic.
Meanwhile, Britain is sleepwalking in a march toward total email surveillance, even as the US brings forward new proposals to punish whistleblowers by extending the Espionage Act. In an electronic world, evidence of these crimes lasts forever – if people get their hands on the books. In the Libor case, notably, a major crime has not been greeted by much demand at the top for criminal prosecutions. That asymmetry is one of the insurance policies of power. Another is to crack down on citizens' protest.
Naomi Wolf is the author, among other books, of The Beauty Myth and Give Me Liberty: A Handbook for American Revolutionaries. She is a graduate of Yale University and New College, Oxford
© Guardian News and Media Limited 2012
CENSORSHIT SECRETS of Olympics London 2012
The Sex Pistols have turned down a request by the organizers to perform at the closing ceremony of the upcoming London Olympics. Johnny Lydon says the reason is due to censorship.
"They came after us for that, but their approach was wrong," says Lydon. "Censorship mattered more than the content of the Pistols. If you're going to be celebrating what is great about Britain, the honesty of the Sex Pistols is one of those things. If you censor the words of any one song, you're killing the honesty and I couldn't tolerate that. From my point of view we said we didn't want nothing to do with them. Such is the world we live in."
Its a criminal offence to use the words Games, Gold and Summer or photo of London sky. The reason to protect the profits of Olympic sponsors.Accredited journalists allowed walk in the Olympic Park with an overbearing police intimidation to the point that London is going to host not just the Paralympics but also paramilitary Olympics. It's permanent lockdown.Britain after a 40year experiment criminalizing everyday speech in British Occupied Ireland now have extended the lockdown of the English language to coverage of the Olympic Games with serious punishment for those who speak freely.
The British Government granted huge concessions in legislation that breaks the principle of both free speech and equality before the law. giving privileges to the Olympics and its sponsors at the expense of the public. The Games’ organizers can control the use of words which may or may not associated with the Games. Bans are also in place on the use of the words Olympic, rings, motto, logo, etc, with the organizers appropriating other ordinary word.Its illegal to use two or more words from List A: ‘Games’; ‘Two Thousand and Twelve’; ‘2012’; and ‘twenty twelve’ and join it with one or more words from List B: ‘Gold’; ‘Silver’; ‘Bronze’; ‘London’; ‘medals’; ‘sponsors’; and ‘summer’. Common nouns are now private property.
Article 10 of the Human Rights Act protects free speech, but the British judiciary and certainly the British Government ignored it. The Olympic Games of London 2012 will provide plenty of evidence for anyone paying attention that Britain is a country where freedom of speech is mouthed in theory but suppressed in reality as in human rights. This time the whole world will be watching as the British intolerant regime men push their censoriousness envelope from British Occupied Ireland to a record-breaking Olympic worldwide extreme.
Saturday, July 7, 2012
Olympic Riots London 2012
London riots already started ahead of Olympics in British Occupied Ireland.
Youths in London are warming-up with a 100 metres swagger that includes throwing a brick through a window and grabbing the biggest flat-screen TV.

Times of India : ' Will London be safe enough to stage the Games? Fresh violence in Hackney, close to the main Olympic stadium in East London, seemed ominous.'
The People's Daily in China : 'With insufficient manpower and financial resources the police will inevitably be overwhelmed with problems in maintaining social order.'

A burning car in Hackney beside the Olympic stadium.
Of course, there will be security firms scanning and searching with their eyes peeled and the secret services monitoring for an expected attack, while many believe riots that have already erupted in British Occupied Ireland will spread to the London Olympics, while over-stretched police are busy waving Royalty and their VIP entourage along their Olympic lane.
.
London Olympic stiff upper lips have curled a little already, with a beach volleyball test event called off, because of rioting in nearby Hackney, while a cycling pre-Olympic road race is in doubt. There is concern that the IOC may even at this late stage, be forced to call the event off, due to public safety concerns. The issue was raised already by the chairman of the IOC's co-ordination commission, with other nations sneering at the British.
Because London is an old imperialist city, with a very bloody background of ethnic cleansing in Ireland and colonies all over the world, safety questions are being asked of it, because of its ongoing human rights abuses in Ireland and worldwide. There are also echos of the same fears expressed about South Africa but with far more shootings and stabbings happening in London.

Thursday, June 21, 2012
QUEEN GREENWASHES SEVEN THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED TONS OF OLYMPIC NUKE TO IRAN
The New Olympics Logo
“Things got out of hand we’d had a few drinks. We smashed the place up and Boris set fire to the toilets.”
Eton College born to rule brat David Cameron, 1986.
“The looting and arson last night were criminality, pure and simple. Justice will be done and the people will see the consequences for their crimes”
Tory Prime Minister of UK David Cameron, 2011
Tory Prime Minister of UK David Cameron, 2011
thatsace.posterous.com
MUM OF TWO GETS 5 MONTHS FOR ACCEPTING LOOTED SHORTS
Greater Manchester police tweeted this earlier – but now removed:
“Mum-of-two, not involved in disorder, Jailed for FIVE months for accepting shorts looted from shop. There are no excuses!”
How does this compare to punishment for our MPs and crooked cops? These bastards are having a field day with war on the poor.
There’s going to be a greater settling of accounts coming soon. Woman jailed is Ursula Nevin.
| WHAT WOULD JESUS DO FOR THE OLYMPICS ? |
Looters: ‘It was like a shopping spree or an invasion of another country '
Because of the discovery of SEVEN THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED TONS of radioactive material buried in and around the Olympic Stadium in London 2012 the Queen of England in a conference call, has asked for advice from Lord Muck of Londonderry, whom she is due to meet shortly at Stormont, the sectarian Parliament for a sectarian people in British Occupied Ireland. He did not after all become Lord Muck without good reason. So let's back up a little to remind ourselves just exactly how he earned his title.
The Groom of the Stool is normally an English groom or a male servant, who has the job of cleaning the Queen or King's arse, after a bowel movement. When the Queen goes on State visits overseas, sometimes the Groom of the Stool goes with her, on other occasions the honour falls to some selected individual, who can be absolutely trusted and cleared by all of Britain's secret services after stringent security checks. A gentleman with the nickname of Muck Guinness who has served as the Queen's Praetorian guard in Ireland for many decades, during the troubles, was chosen for the role, on the Queen's state visit to the Irish free state, before he became a Presidential candidate in the neo-colonial state last year.
Over the centuries the role of Groom of the Stool, has evolved into licking the Royal's arse, after they discovered a pleasurable sensation, when the Groom of the Stool acquired the art of what is contemporarily known as rimming. Henry VIII had Sir Henry Norreys, a Groom of the Stool executed, because he went a bit far performing his duties, on every orrifice of the King's wife's body, a woman who became Queen, otherwise known by the name of Ann Boylan who was from Ireland. Henry had her name changed to Ann Boleyn, because she worked as a prostitute in Laurencetown in County Galway and preferred the services of the groom's tongue to Henry's.
After the Ann Boylan episode and the execution, Henry VIII's awarded the title Groom of the Stool, to a minion of the King, who licked, along with other court companions and kept an eye on each other for the King, as they attended to the King whenever he had a bowel movement. They also carried out a variety of other tasks within his private rooms but this has been censored by Indymedia Ireland. The position of Groom of the Stool was especially prized, as it allowed unobstructed access to the Royal's attention with intimate favours like Lord Muck currently.
A list below of those who have worked as Groom of the Stool in the British Royal Household, with the exception of the present incumbent, whose official name remains a closely guarded secret under the British Official Secrets Act but may have connections to Indymedia Ireland. However Muck Guinness has officially been chosen as trusted Groom of the Stool, to lick the Queen's arse during her forthcoming Irish visit to British Occupied Ireland. He is believed to have served his apprenticeship in this role, with various other officials from the other Palace along the Thames and is believed to have swallowed a considerable amount of endangered Royal faeces and urine already.
Queen Elizabeth is believed to poo sparingly except after gin binges and she has been taking elocution lessons for her forthcoming Stormont Irish trip, which will include her asking questions like, "Oi! where's the Bog, Muck?" "Come on our fella give us a lick !" or "Pog Mo Shon Galla, oinseach" in a north of Ireland accent. Bog is the English version of her potty.POg Mo Shon is Gaelic for Lick my Arse ! It is believed that she will travel to Ireland with her own toilet seat, so that her Royal Arse does not touch the same seat, as the arses of her loyal Irish commoners or her west Brit peasants not to be confused with citizens of the Irish free state, won for citizens north and south of the border with considerable sacrifice. It is believed that Muck Guinness has unclogged the septic's of hundreds of commoners from the other palace on the Thames, before scrounging for arse biscuits, behind the Windsor's.
Originally the title Groom of the Stool referred to the arselicker or whoever served in that royal capacity. So for example the Muck Guinness title would become Queen Lizzie's Arselicker as well as Chief of Staff.. Later it referred to the long trailing robe of the Queen from the Latin stola, which Muck Guinness would be obliged to carry around British Occupied Ireland after the Queen's visit. It is believed that Muck Guinness as holder of the position during the forthcoming Queen's visit, will become a senior Lord of the Bedchamber or Prince-consort of the Queen's Man of the Robes, when he will be officially become known as Lord Muck of Londonderry.
Lord Muck we have learned has advised the Queen to sell the SEVEN THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED TONS of radioactive dirt to Iran, whom MI6 claim are trying to build an atomic bomb, There is enough radioactive dirt, disturbed because of Olympic excavations in east London, to enable the Iranians to build 500 atomic bombs.Lord Muck has then advised the Queen with true Muck treachery, that as soon as they have moved the considerable quantities of radioactive dirt, to inform the Israeli's of the arrangement, so that they can nuke Iran immediately. So its Goodnight Tehran, hello a nuclear free Olympic Games.
Lord Muck has further advised his Queen, to enlist the services of both BP petroleum and DOW Chemicals with the subsequent clean up-operation. Both British companies who are already Olympic sponsors, have considerable experience after BP almost wiped out single handedly, the natural environment of North America from Alaska to the Gulf with oil spills, while DOW has walked away from wiping out thousands of Indians with chemical explosions. Both have acquired considerable cover-up experience and greenwashing tactics as official sponsors for the Games. So we can expect plenty of muck and excitement for the games, with nuclear explosions, poverty riots and human right protests, at what has already become known as the Scum Olympics of London 2012.
Lord Muck has been preceded by the following;
Grooms of the Stool to Charles II
1660: William Seymour, 1st Marquess of Hertford
1660–1685: Sir John Granville
Grooms of the Stool to James II
1685–1688: Henry Mordaunt, 2nd Earl of Peterborough
Grooms of the Stool to William III
1689–1700: Baron Hans Bentinck
1700–1702: Henry Sydney, 1st Earl of Romney
Grooms of the Stool to Queen Anne
1702–1711: Sarah Churchill, Countess of Marlborough
1711–1714: Elizabeth Seymour, Duchess of Somerset
Grooms of the Stool to Prince George
1683–1697: John Berkeley, 3rd Baron Berkeley of Stratton
1702–1704: Henry Sydney, 1st Earl of Romney
Grooms of the Stool to George I
1714–1719: Lionel Sackville, 1st Duke of Dorset
1719–1722: Charles Spencer, 3rd Earl of Sunderland
1723–1727: Francis Godolphin, 2nd Earl of Godolphin
Grooms of the Stool to George II
1727–1735: Francis Godolphin, 2nd Earl of Godolphin
1735–1751: Henry Herbert, 9th Earl of Pembroke
1751–1755: Willem Anne van Keppel, 2nd Earl of Albemarle
1755–1760: William Nassau de Zuylestein, 4th Earl of Rochford
Grooms of the Stool to George III
1760–1761: John Stuart, 3rd Earl of Bute
1761–1770: Francis Hastings, 10th Earl of Huntingdon
1770–1775: George Hervey, 2nd Earl of Bristol
1775–1782: John Ashburnham, 2nd Earl of Ashburnham
1782–1796: Thomas Thynne, 3rd Viscount Weymouth
1796–1804: John Ker, 3rd Duke of Roxburghe
1804–1812: George Finch, 9th Earl of Winchilsea
1812–1820: Charles Paulet, 13th Marquess of Winchester
Grooms of the Stool to George IV
1820–1830: Charles Paulet, 13th Marquess of Winchester
Grooms of the Stool to William IV
1830–1837: Charles Paulet, 13th Marquess of Winchester
Grooms of the Stool to Prince Albert
1840–1841: Lord Robert Grosvenor
1841–1846: Brownlow Cecil, 2nd Marquess of Exeter
1846–1859: James Hamilton, 1st Duke of Abercorn
1859–1861: John Spencer, 5th Earl Spencer
Grooms of the Stool to The Prince of Wales
1862–1866: John Spencer, 5th Earl Spencer
1877–1883: Sir William Knollys
1883–1901: James Hamilton, 2nd Duke of Abercorn
P.S. if you do attend or participate in the games please bring a radiation suit as being roasted alive is no laughing matter. Please reshare or pass this on to your friends as there is already a huge cover up and censorship operation in place!
london 2012, London Olympics, Olympic Games 2012, Olympics, Olympics 2012, Olympics London 2012, Queen, Google Images, Ireland, Irish, Lord Muck,
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
















